Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ted's avatar

"Conor is asking in good faith."

Is he, really?

The detailed, personal accounts are already available to anyone who chooses to pay attention to them.

Wait and see what he does with the responses he receives. If the pattern persists, the result will be an article suffused with straw-man arguments, but not limited to that particular fallacy.

You offered an answer in good faith, Mr. Hart, but you've been publishing all along and how many times has Friedersdorf consulted with or quoted you?

"Good faith" is precisely what has been so conspicuous by its absence, from the very beginning of the deliberately-induced mass hysteria of the Covid event.

Anyone who has engaged with the uncertainty endemic to medical care, has long become accustomed to verifying assertions and avoiding the harm attendant to blind trust, but the malfeasance of "public health" during the mass hysteria, is still destroying lives.

Friedersdorf is asking why the propaganda has been less effective than expected. There is no forgiveness forthcoming, no absolution without open and honest contrition. Anyone who trusts without rigorous verification, is either uninformed or enmired in self-deception.

It's very simple; they lied; deliberately, cynically and in pursuit of their self-interest without regard for the visible harm they did to others. It will be at least a generation before trust can be regained, and that would only be if the chattering classes made a volte face and began telling the verifiable truth.

Crixcyon's avatar

There is no automatic trusting of anything. Trust must be earned and then re-solidified time and time again. Not many things deserve continued trust and very few things deserve outright blind trust. Government and medicine beign two excellent examples.

45 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?