All good and well but until the liars are punished and convicted and justice is delivered then nothing changes. The Democrats will regain power someday and they will let the demons out again.
Accountability matters ā no argument there. But I'd say this: the fact that Bhattacharya is now running the NIH, that the lab leak went from "misinformation" to Senate testimony, that Fauci had to answer questions under oath ā none of that was inevitable. It happened because people refused to shut up. The structural changes Dr. B is making now are designed to outlast any single administration. That's the real play.
I appreciate those thoughts and why they are important unless there is real consequences the next guy will just do it again because there is zero personal risk. A couple incarcerated or worse Bureaucrats would go a long way to reestablishing trust in the Government which there is zero today.
Let's see if it turns to reality. I hope Dr B also makes changes at the NIH that make it take much longer for it to go sour again. I have no idea what that looks like but I assume Dr B will need congress to pass laws as well Dr. B to making changes to how research is funded and completed, success criteria are defined, departments are organized, etc.
That said, having been just smart enough to follow along over these years but not smart enough to help in any meaningful way, I appreciate your (and others) part in this *very* much.
Thank you, Bill ā genuinely. And don't sell yourself short. Following along, staying informed, sharing what you learn with people around you ā that IS helping. That's how the Overton window moved on all of this.
On the structural question: you're right that Congress matters. But Dr. B can do a lot administratively ā reforming how grants are awarded, ending the revolving door between NIH program officers and the journals they fund, restoring the firewall between funding decisions and political pressure. The DOGE-style transparency push is a start. If the funding process itself becomes more open, it gets much harder for a small group to hijack the entire research apparatus again.
Outstanding coverage of whatmight be the single most important institutional shift in modern public health. The irony of Bhattacharya now directing the institution that funded his censorship is almost poetic. His willingness to actually answer questions directly instead of bureaucratic deflection is so refeshing after years of stonewalling.
"Almost poetic" is exactly right. The man who was blacklisted by the institution now runs it. And the contrast in communication style is the tell ā when you've actually done the work and thought through the problems, you can answer questions plainly. The bureaucratic deflection was never about complexity; it was about concealment. Appreciate the kind words on the coverage.
That's a big ask ā and an important one. The short version: the original clinical trials were too short and too small to catch rare but serious adverse events. We now have years of post-market data, VAERS signals, and peer-reviewed studies documenting myocarditis (especially in young men), neurological events, and other injuries at rates well above what was initially disclosed. The "safe and effective" framing was always a marketing line, not a scientific conclusion. I've covered pieces of this across several posts ā and Dr. Bhattacharya's NIH may finally be the institution willing to fund the comprehensive study we should have had from day one.
All this means is that it is still full steam ahead for the vaccination schedule. No vaccine has been permanently removed. All that changed is a few recommendations. The big pharma controlled AAP will still instruct it's 67,000 members to carpet bomb every child with dozens of injections.
The vaccine machine has NOT been dismantled one iota. Newborns still get poisoned immediately after exiting the holy womb, parents call still inject their kids with every toxic vaccine on the planet (all 80 injections) and mRMA poisons are still readily promoted and available thanks to the HHS. Autism is alive and well as are big pharma profits...despite bourla and bancel crying in the rain.
GOF? Then why do we need hundreds of biolabs trying to create nasty things? Name me ONE positive to come out of any biolab that is a boon to the health of humanity. The HHS is planning for the next fake pandemic and it will be even more invasive, restricting and enforced. Be prepared and alert.
Strange that Hawley seems to keep referring to gain of function research in wuhan and how important it was to to end. What about GoF research elsewhere?
Sharp observation. Wuhan gets the focus because that's where the paper trail leads ā EcoHealth, the grant applications, the specific experiments. But you're right that GoF research isn't unique to one lab. There are BSL-3 and BSL-4 facilities doing enhanced pathogen research across the US, Europe, and Asia. The real policy question is whether we ban the methodology globally or just play whack-a-mole with individual labs. Bhattacharya has signaled he wants NIH out of the funding business for this kind of work entirely, which would be a start.
VAERS results revealed mRNA adverse reactions much more often than longer used vaccines. Moderna did trash thousands of unused covid shots in ā25 as underutilized and expired product.
This. "He also dropped this data bomb: autism rates have exploded from 1 in 10,000 children in 1985 to 1 in 31 today. (Thatās not a rounding error.)"
It's also not the result of "looking harder and widening the definition" despite what (I am sure) will be the refrain from vaccine hucksters and their bought-and-paid-for sycophants. I look forward to a time when the work of people who earlier wondered about the links between vaccines and autism sees the light of day. Dr. B's testimony gives me hope.
All good and well but until the liars are punished and convicted and justice is delivered then nothing changes. The Democrats will regain power someday and they will let the demons out again.
Accountability matters ā no argument there. But I'd say this: the fact that Bhattacharya is now running the NIH, that the lab leak went from "misinformation" to Senate testimony, that Fauci had to answer questions under oath ā none of that was inevitable. It happened because people refused to shut up. The structural changes Dr. B is making now are designed to outlast any single administration. That's the real play.
I appreciate those thoughts and why they are important unless there is real consequences the next guy will just do it again because there is zero personal risk. A couple incarcerated or worse Bureaucrats would go a long way to reestablishing trust in the Government which there is zero today.
Let's see if it turns to reality. I hope Dr B also makes changes at the NIH that make it take much longer for it to go sour again. I have no idea what that looks like but I assume Dr B will need congress to pass laws as well Dr. B to making changes to how research is funded and completed, success criteria are defined, departments are organized, etc.
That said, having been just smart enough to follow along over these years but not smart enough to help in any meaningful way, I appreciate your (and others) part in this *very* much.
Thank you, Bill ā genuinely. And don't sell yourself short. Following along, staying informed, sharing what you learn with people around you ā that IS helping. That's how the Overton window moved on all of this.
On the structural question: you're right that Congress matters. But Dr. B can do a lot administratively ā reforming how grants are awarded, ending the revolving door between NIH program officers and the journals they fund, restoring the firewall between funding decisions and political pressure. The DOGE-style transparency push is a start. If the funding process itself becomes more open, it gets much harder for a small group to hijack the entire research apparatus again.
Outstanding coverage of whatmight be the single most important institutional shift in modern public health. The irony of Bhattacharya now directing the institution that funded his censorship is almost poetic. His willingness to actually answer questions directly instead of bureaucratic deflection is so refeshing after years of stonewalling.
"Almost poetic" is exactly right. The man who was blacklisted by the institution now runs it. And the contrast in communication style is the tell ā when you've actually done the work and thought through the problems, you can answer questions plainly. The bureaucratic deflection was never about complexity; it was about concealment. Appreciate the kind words on the coverage.
I would like a report on if the Covid vaccines were safe and effective, and ifcthey cause vaccine injuries and to what extent.
That's a big ask ā and an important one. The short version: the original clinical trials were too short and too small to catch rare but serious adverse events. We now have years of post-market data, VAERS signals, and peer-reviewed studies documenting myocarditis (especially in young men), neurological events, and other injuries at rates well above what was initially disclosed. The "safe and effective" framing was always a marketing line, not a scientific conclusion. I've covered pieces of this across several posts ā and Dr. Bhattacharya's NIH may finally be the institution willing to fund the comprehensive study we should have had from day one.
All this means is that it is still full steam ahead for the vaccination schedule. No vaccine has been permanently removed. All that changed is a few recommendations. The big pharma controlled AAP will still instruct it's 67,000 members to carpet bomb every child with dozens of injections.
The vaccine machine has NOT been dismantled one iota. Newborns still get poisoned immediately after exiting the holy womb, parents call still inject their kids with every toxic vaccine on the planet (all 80 injections) and mRMA poisons are still readily promoted and available thanks to the HHS. Autism is alive and well as are big pharma profits...despite bourla and bancel crying in the rain.
GOF? Then why do we need hundreds of biolabs trying to create nasty things? Name me ONE positive to come out of any biolab that is a boon to the health of humanity. The HHS is planning for the next fake pandemic and it will be even more invasive, restricting and enforced. Be prepared and alert.
Strange that Hawley seems to keep referring to gain of function research in wuhan and how important it was to to end. What about GoF research elsewhere?
Sharp observation. Wuhan gets the focus because that's where the paper trail leads ā EcoHealth, the grant applications, the specific experiments. But you're right that GoF research isn't unique to one lab. There are BSL-3 and BSL-4 facilities doing enhanced pathogen research across the US, Europe, and Asia. The real policy question is whether we ban the methodology globally or just play whack-a-mole with individual labs. Bhattacharya has signaled he wants NIH out of the funding business for this kind of work entirely, which would be a start.
VAERS results revealed mRNA adverse reactions much more often than longer used vaccines. Moderna did trash thousands of unused covid shots in ā25 as underutilized and expired product.
This. "He also dropped this data bomb: autism rates have exploded from 1 in 10,000 children in 1985 to 1 in 31 today. (Thatās not a rounding error.)"
It's also not the result of "looking harder and widening the definition" despite what (I am sure) will be the refrain from vaccine hucksters and their bought-and-paid-for sycophants. I look forward to a time when the work of people who earlier wondered about the links between vaccines and autism sees the light of day. Dr. B's testimony gives me hope.