Rational Ground by Justin Hart

Rational Ground by Justin Hart

We Checked Our Money Tracker Against the TV Ad Data. Here's What It Missed.

New Wesleyan Media Project numbers confirm the shifts we flagged — money flooding Kansas, fleeing North Carolina. They also show two things our tracker can't see, and one thing it got wrong.

Justin Hart's avatar
Justin Hart
Oct 16, 2026

Before we start: $56 gets you the whole election.

This is what a Rational Ground membership pays for. The forecast. The money tracker. The daily rebuild every morning before you’re awake. The work you’re about to read — pulling two independent datasets against each other, finding a flaw in our own counting method, and fixing it in public — is not cheap to do, and nobody is paying us to do it.

Right now it’s $56. That’s the election-season rate, and it is the best deal we have ever offered on this publication. Fifty-six dollars for every forecast update, every money-tracker refresh, and every piece like this one from now through November and beyond.

If you have ever opened the forecast page twice in one day — and our logs say a lot of you do — this is the moment to make it official.

👉 Grab the $56 membership now. It is the cheapest this will ever be.


New ad-tracking numbers from the Wesleyan Media Project back up the big shifts we flagged: money pouring into Kansas and leaving North Carolina. They also show two things our tracker can’t see — and one thing it got wrong.

Our forecast’s money tracker follows outside spending: the super PACs, party committees and other groups that must report to the Federal Election Commission when they spend for or against a candidate. It’s fast and it’s public. But it isn’t the whole picture.

Subscribe for free to continue reading

Enter your email and get every post from Rational Ground by Justin Hart.
Already have an account? Sign in
© 2026 COVID Reason · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture