I don’t know anything about Candace Owens, but based on this account she likely suffers from some level of paranoia, probably including schizophrenia. I’ve had some dealings with people suffering from this. In one case my wife had a single, divorced friend who would tell her things like cameras were in her AC vents watching her, but when she took the vents off to find the cameras, something would pull them back into the duct work and she couldn’t get to them. She thought her ex had hired people who would sit in a van outside her house tapping her phone (this was back in land line times). She had a job and could function, but these delusions seemed to control her thought life. Eventually the poor woman took her own life. She left behind a sort of diary that documented her torment. Entries like “there was a white car in the parking lot again today. And the white car was at the gas station too!!!!!” It’s impossible to reason with someone like this or show them that their fantasies are impossible. anosognosia is the term for this. It means someone is mentally ill, but can’t be brought to understand they are mentally ill. If I’m right about this, it’s sad. Her future will not be good.
I think what has happened to Candace is very sad, and I think you’re probably correct about the cause.
I had a workplace experience that mirrors the belief of the affected person. She seemingly, out of nowhere, began telling fantastical tales of what she believed to be happening to her. She believed her landline phone was tapped, and that Everyone in the office was listening in. She made other assertions and later began acting aggressively towards another female employee. She told me that she didn’t have a problem, everyone else did. Eventually, she was fired due to her continued workplace behavior and deteriorating performance. This was almost 40 years ago.
I had another experience with someone who had a meth addiction earlier and went to rehab. He told me that there were cameras in his ductwork. He cut a number of holes in his roof looking for evidence. He found nothing. He also talked about white vehicles following and surveilling him. He eventually stopped the behavior.
Why do you refute this? She is exposing some very high officials with disgusting and amoral values. I really hate when someone says, “I don’t know anything about …” so and so, But this is what I think. Stop at I don’t know!! I for one thank Candace for exposing the lies and she is free to share her fears! Most likely true!!
She's exposed nothing except her utter lack for regard of the truth. Her latest claim that Charlie was killed by French Legionaires to thwart her from finding out a Brigette is insulting to anyone's intelligence.
It doesn't seem quite so simple to me. Overall, I agree with your assessment but Candace has actually been instrumental in bringing to light strange facts about the Kirk shooting which cast serious doubt on the official story. If she had only stopped there. I don't know where this story ends for her but I'm disengaging from her content for the sake of my own sanity.
1. She has exposed the English speaking world to the fact that Brigitte Macron is born a biological male who groomed Emmanuel Macron when he was still a 14yo child.
2. She has exposed a smatter of proven lies from TPUSA and actors connected to the assassination of her friend, Charlie Kirk.
3. The reason for her going public with the threats on her life and who's responsible is for protection. That is, if her friend Charlie Kirk had gone public with the threats on his life, he would still be alive.
I don't understand what has happened to her! And I don't even know what's true or not anymore. I used to look up whatever people would say, just to see if it was accurate. But there is SO much now. Where do we even start looking? It's exhausting.
If only we had a profession whose job and calling was to investigate public claims/stories so that the public could have factual, correct information...
If 5 years ago me would have heard the things today’s me believes, the former would think the latter a conspiracy theory nut case. I keep an open mind.
I would say that with everything happening: covid, gain of function, coerced experimental vaccines, voting fraud, state and country government sponsered media, crashing economies, company collapses, not enough doctors, high cost housing, indigenous now owning the land your free title and paid for home sits on, unchecked immigration, etc etc. You should be paranoid and if you aren't, you are dumb.
I read Pale Fire as a kid and was sure it was just a comedy piece; I was familiar with Nabokov from Lolita, and there were so many crazy references in PF to Kinbote's privileged childhood in Zembla that it could definitely make you laugh out loud. The monologue about his upbringing from Austin Powers' "Dr. Evil" was reminiscent:
"My childhood was typical: summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring, we'd make meat helmets. When I was insolent, I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds; pretty standard stuff, really."
True.. All true.... EXCEPT that mossad first, has a long proven track record of assassination. And DISINFO. Kirks assassination is unquestionably weird. The rest... Mrs macron etc, is borderline delusional and the problem is... One nabokov would like... It's delusional even if it's true
It's completely understandable for people to prefer various sources and not others. But when you obviously don't watch her hour-long segments (not a big time investment considering the amount of evidence she shares), it's interesting that you think you are qualified to judge her reporting -- particularly for someone so despised by establishment forces that every possible thing that can be taken out of context will be, and smears and lies are of course par for the course. To each his own, but since I have watched hours and hours of her intelligent, valuable reporting, I predict that you will eat your words when the truths she shares on so many very critical subjects finally come from sources you prefer.
1. Why are we still waiting for one single evidence of Brigitte Macron being a biological woman and mother to three children?
2. Why hasn't president Trump stated that Owens is lying about his phone call to her, begging her to stop talking about Brigitte because otherwise young christian men will continue to die on the Ukrainian step in the thousands because president Macron stated this as a condition for him to support Trumps peace efforts? To make Candace shut up.
She is a sick SOB making shit up that she can’t not prove just to get clicks and to monetize the horror of Charlie Kirk’s murder by a person who has confessed to it to at least two-people his dad and his boyfriend. The state of Utah by law does not release autopsies and the officials are doing all they can do not to convict the person who confessed in the public arena unlike what Minnesota did to the cops in the George Floyd incident
Mr. and "Mrs." Macron, the fraudulent Rothschild puppets who lied their way into the Elysee Palace, need to be exposed as the frauds they truly are, which everyone in France already knows.
🤣 And if you have not seen it yet: 😆
"Mon malaise à moi /My own malaise - Parody de Mon manège à moi - Edith Piaf"
Asking questions to uncover truth is a GOOD thing.
Telling lies, or saying that it's OK to tell lies, is a BAD thing.
It's quite worse to lie to millions of French to control the reins of power there.
(I would expect that big lies make politicians vulnerable to blackmail.)
It doesn't matter if u live in France or some other supposedly "civilized" country.
It doesn't matter where you vote, or whether you vote, or if you never vote.
The bigger the fraud, the better to expose the lies. "Safe and effective" is another example of a huge lie ... more accurately, "safe and effective" was two lies.
I don’t know anything about Candace Owens, but based on this account she likely suffers from some level of paranoia, probably including schizophrenia. I’ve had some dealings with people suffering from this. In one case my wife had a single, divorced friend who would tell her things like cameras were in her AC vents watching her, but when she took the vents off to find the cameras, something would pull them back into the duct work and she couldn’t get to them. She thought her ex had hired people who would sit in a van outside her house tapping her phone (this was back in land line times). She had a job and could function, but these delusions seemed to control her thought life. Eventually the poor woman took her own life. She left behind a sort of diary that documented her torment. Entries like “there was a white car in the parking lot again today. And the white car was at the gas station too!!!!!” It’s impossible to reason with someone like this or show them that their fantasies are impossible. anosognosia is the term for this. It means someone is mentally ill, but can’t be brought to understand they are mentally ill. If I’m right about this, it’s sad. Her future will not be good.
I think what has happened to Candace is very sad, and I think you’re probably correct about the cause.
I had a workplace experience that mirrors the belief of the affected person. She seemingly, out of nowhere, began telling fantastical tales of what she believed to be happening to her. She believed her landline phone was tapped, and that Everyone in the office was listening in. She made other assertions and later began acting aggressively towards another female employee. She told me that she didn’t have a problem, everyone else did. Eventually, she was fired due to her continued workplace behavior and deteriorating performance. This was almost 40 years ago.
I had another experience with someone who had a meth addiction earlier and went to rehab. He told me that there were cameras in his ductwork. He cut a number of holes in his roof looking for evidence. He found nothing. He also talked about white vehicles following and surveilling him. He eventually stopped the behavior.
The best article I have read on Candace and this whole fiasco. Excellent discernment.
Thanks!
Why do you refute this? She is exposing some very high officials with disgusting and amoral values. I really hate when someone says, “I don’t know anything about …” so and so, But this is what I think. Stop at I don’t know!! I for one thank Candace for exposing the lies and she is free to share her fears! Most likely true!!
She's exposed nothing except her utter lack for regard of the truth. Her latest claim that Charlie was killed by French Legionaires to thwart her from finding out a Brigette is insulting to anyone's intelligence.
It doesn't seem quite so simple to me. Overall, I agree with your assessment but Candace has actually been instrumental in bringing to light strange facts about the Kirk shooting which cast serious doubt on the official story. If she had only stopped there. I don't know where this story ends for her but I'm disengaging from her content for the sake of my own sanity.
1. She has exposed the English speaking world to the fact that Brigitte Macron is born a biological male who groomed Emmanuel Macron when he was still a 14yo child.
2. She has exposed a smatter of proven lies from TPUSA and actors connected to the assassination of her friend, Charlie Kirk.
3. The reason for her going public with the threats on her life and who's responsible is for protection. That is, if her friend Charlie Kirk had gone public with the threats on his life, he would still be alive.
A life insurance.
I don't understand what has happened to her! And I don't even know what's true or not anymore. I used to look up whatever people would say, just to see if it was accurate. But there is SO much now. Where do we even start looking? It's exhausting.
If only we had a profession whose job and calling was to investigate public claims/stories so that the public could have factual, correct information...
If 5 years ago me would have heard the things today’s me believes, the former would think the latter a conspiracy theory nut case. I keep an open mind.
I would say that with everything happening: covid, gain of function, coerced experimental vaccines, voting fraud, state and country government sponsered media, crashing economies, company collapses, not enough doctors, high cost housing, indigenous now owning the land your free title and paid for home sits on, unchecked immigration, etc etc. You should be paranoid and if you aren't, you are dumb.
Oh, I forgot to mention assassinations and attempted assassinations.
I read Pale Fire as a kid and was sure it was just a comedy piece; I was familiar with Nabokov from Lolita, and there were so many crazy references in PF to Kinbote's privileged childhood in Zembla that it could definitely make you laugh out loud. The monologue about his upbringing from Austin Powers' "Dr. Evil" was reminiscent:
"My childhood was typical: summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring, we'd make meat helmets. When I was insolent, I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds; pretty standard stuff, really."
😂😂😂
True.. All true.... EXCEPT that mossad first, has a long proven track record of assassination. And DISINFO. Kirks assassination is unquestionably weird. The rest... Mrs macron etc, is borderline delusional and the problem is... One nabokov would like... It's delusional even if it's true
It's completely understandable for people to prefer various sources and not others. But when you obviously don't watch her hour-long segments (not a big time investment considering the amount of evidence she shares), it's interesting that you think you are qualified to judge her reporting -- particularly for someone so despised by establishment forces that every possible thing that can be taken out of context will be, and smears and lies are of course par for the course. To each his own, but since I have watched hours and hours of her intelligent, valuable reporting, I predict that you will eat your words when the truths she shares on so many very critical subjects finally come from sources you prefer.
I would have agreed when this was published, but has your opinion changed any with the Veritas release?
Candace Owens has been right so far.
1. Why are we still waiting for one single evidence of Brigitte Macron being a biological woman and mother to three children?
2. Why hasn't president Trump stated that Owens is lying about his phone call to her, begging her to stop talking about Brigitte because otherwise young christian men will continue to die on the Ukrainian step in the thousands because president Macron stated this as a condition for him to support Trumps peace efforts? To make Candace shut up.
Do you know?
She is a sick SOB making shit up that she can’t not prove just to get clicks and to monetize the horror of Charlie Kirk’s murder by a person who has confessed to it to at least two-people his dad and his boyfriend. The state of Utah by law does not release autopsies and the officials are doing all they can do not to convict the person who confessed in the public arena unlike what Minnesota did to the cops in the George Floyd incident
The only thing I can’t decide is if she is doing all of this on purpose or has just completely lost touch with reality
Mr. and "Mrs." Macron, the fraudulent Rothschild puppets who lied their way into the Elysee Palace, need to be exposed as the frauds they truly are, which everyone in France already knows.
🤣 And if you have not seen it yet: 😆
"Mon malaise à moi /My own malaise - Parody de Mon manège à moi - Edith Piaf"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBixDtKJAfI
3m
[Sarah Jane Iffra's parody of Prez Emmanuel Macron and the First "Lady"]
ENJOY! 😂 🤣
Why does it need to "be exposed"? Do any of us vote in France? Are any of us voyeurs who obsess over Macron's wife? Honestly, who cares?
"Honestly, who cares?"
It's simple really:
Asking questions to uncover truth is a GOOD thing.
Telling lies, or saying that it's OK to tell lies, is a BAD thing.
It's quite worse to lie to millions of French to control the reins of power there.
(I would expect that big lies make politicians vulnerable to blackmail.)
It doesn't matter if u live in France or some other supposedly "civilized" country.
It doesn't matter where you vote, or whether you vote, or if you never vote.
The bigger the fraud, the better to expose the lies. "Safe and effective" is another example of a huge lie ... more accurately, "safe and effective" was two lies.