Critical Vaccine Updates

We’re hoping to provide you an update on tomorrow’s podcast on some critical updates around recent vaccines studies.

Listen to us on the Callin website, Apple iTunes, or Spotify.

First, there are MULTIPLE viral tweets and posts going around about recently released documents from Pfizer.

If you recall, Pfizer tried to slow-roll the release of the documentation they provided to the government. Someone did the calculations and found out that the timeline they proposed (at 500 docs per month) would put the final release some 75 years into the future. That has not aged well and a judge ruled they would need to produce and publish things at a much quicker pace.

You can find all of the documents at this website.

One assertion making the rounds is that Pfizer initially published findings that pregnant women should not take the vaccine, that women should wait 2 months until after taking the vaccine to get pregnant and that breast-feeding was a no-no. This was the doc making the rounds.

There is much confusion around this but with the help of Jean Rees and others we found the source.

On Dec 30 2020, the UK government posted notice regarding the upcoming availability of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. It recommends AGAINST giving the vaccine to pregnant women, warned NOT to get pregnant & advised AGAINST breast-feeding.

A WayBackMachine search gave us that language (identical to the one in the screenshot). 3 days later, the language had completely changed. All the warnings had been dropped.

Even a year later, Pfizer was still warning about these issues while the CDC was still declaring that it was safe for pregnant mothers-to-be.

Over the next few days we’ll be diving into the details on the vaccine and how it because strongly recommended by the CDC and approved by the FDA even given the bare bones efforts to study the impact on pregnant women and breast-feeding.

Our good friend, Daniel Horowitz, notes 4 new studies and data points worth exploring around the vaccine itself and other adverse reactions:

“1) A study out of Cyprus published in Cureus titled, “Mortality in Cyprus Over the Period 2016-2021” observed a 9.7% increase in all-cause mortality in Cyprus in 2021 compared to 2020, and 16.5% compared to the mean mortality of the previous five years. The pattern developed mainly in the third and fourth quarters of last year, perfectly aligning with the timing of the vaccine surge in the Mediterranean island.”

“2) MIT and Israeli researchers studied the trend of cardiac-related ambulance calls in Israel in 2019 (pre-COVID) and compared them to the same time frame in 2020 (COVID but pre-vaccine) and 2021 (COVID with vaccine). The study found that COVID shots were "significantly associated" with a 25% increase in emergency medical services for both cardiac arrest (CA) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 16- to 39-year-olds in Israel from January to May 2021.”

“3) There has been a 28% increase in deaths in Iceland for the first quarter of this year over the previous five-year average.”

“4) A recent preprint Danish study in the prestigious Lancet, which followed the all-cause mortality of the Pfizer and Moderna trial participants, found absolutely no all-cause mortality benefit from the two mRNA shots.”

Not to be upstaged the traditional Covid vaccine from J&J is coming under scrutiny from numerous angles. One study, fully peer-reviewed now, notes a significant signal of Guillain-Barré Syndrome post shot of the Janssen vaccine

Findings  In this cohort study of surveillance data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink that included 15.1 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines, the unadjusted incidence rate of confirmed GBS in the 1 to 21 days after receiving the Ad.26.COV2.S (Janssen) vaccine was 32.4 per 100 000 person-years, which was significantly higher than the background rate of GBS. The unadjusted incidence rate of confirmed GBS in the 1 to 21 days after mRNA vaccines was 1.3 per 100 000 person-years, which did not differ from the background rate.

Lots of breaking news. Stay tuned!